| Deviant Login | Shop | Join deviantART for FREE  |
Take the Tour  |
| Photography / Architecture / Exterior | ©2008-2013 `Pixydream |
The Journal Portal
Browse Journals |
Polls |
deviantART [dee·vee·un'nt·ART]
Keep in Touch!
|
Deviousness `anmari has been spreading her infectious positivity throughout our community for over 6 years. Throughout this time Ana has been at the core of all things devious, passionately developing an eclectic gallery, helping organise devmeets, participating in chat events and also recently completed dedicating her time as a Community Volunteer. We are absolutely delighted to bestow the Deviousness Award for May 2013 to `anmari, congratulations! Read More
|
Sta.sh
This photo has been featured in my journal
[link]
about the photo:
I don't know, maybe it's me... but I see an heavy burning on the upper left and I cant make up my mind about its funcion: maybe to push the observer's eye to the right?
In that case my (personal
Moreover I see an out-of-focus/blurred sky...
let me know what you really think about this photo of yours as mine seems to be the only contrary voice...
In fact about that pic, two things... first, the heavy burning you spoke about is due to a bad use of my circular polariser, but I liked the effect which leads to the center of the pic and the ray of light which lighted the palace, I just enforced the natural vignette of my wide angle (17x40 Canon lens)on the left...
About the vase, I don't know. Cause of the wide angle effect I use the dxo software to correct the perspective, all is correct now for the building, but yes there is a bit of distorsion on the vase, I don't k,ow why and how it appeared.
The sky was not corrected, the blurring effect is 100% natural.
So what's about my feeling with that pic??? I hesitated a long time before to post this one, but I liked the light in it and the climate, of course it's not a perfect photo, and certainly not one of my best, you're right, but the general feeling is very close to my perception of Versailles...
However, i would say a grat thanks for your comment, critics are rare, and I need them to progress.
See you my friend
Now I know the distortion in the vase comes from the correction of the perspective. but my question remain the same: does really Bruno Mercier need to correct his lines that much in postwork?
we're talking about Bruno Mercier here not "pincopallino" as we say in Rome.
I belive this software is not good as the lines are not correct.
the lower step of the stairs can't be perfectly horizontal from your position, it should go down to the right.
I belive that way the top of the vase would be ok...
Concerning that problem of perspective distorsion, I think a 24 TSE lens would be better, but I haven't that type of lens, so I take my pics with my wide angle, a 17x40 even if i know it's not a perfect solution to shoot architecture...
thanks again i appreciate a lot that sort of comment.